Table of Content
It is also crucial for architects to work closely with the technological innovations which could enable to develop a new level of delivering comfort inhabitation. Nowadays modern requirements demand new approaches to the awareness of modernity that concerns not only detail orientated solutions, but also innovative ideas and opportunities based on advancements in technology. In his article, “A Home is Not a House,” Reyner Banham offers his architectural criticism regarding the mega-structures in a majority of the American houses.
The New Canaan glass-house consists essentially of just these two elements, a heated brick floor slab, and a standing unit which is a chimney/fireplace on one side and a bathroom on the other. This can never replace the time-honored ranch-style tri-level standing proudly in a landscape of five defeated shrubs, flanked on one side by a ranch-style tri-level with six shrubs and on the other by a ranch-style tri-level with four small boys and a private dust bowl. If the countless Americans who are successfully raising nice children in trailers will excuse me for a moment, I have a few suggestions to make to the even more countless Americans who are so insecure that they have to hide inside fake monuments of Permastone and instant roofing. There are, admittedly, very sound day-to-day advantages to having warm broadloom on a firm floor underfoot, rather than pine needles and poison ivy.
Urban Space and Representation in Literary Study
America's pioneer house builders recognized this by commonly building their brick chimneys on a brick floor slab. A transparent air dome could be anchored to such a slab just as easily as could a balloon frame, and the standard-of-living-package could hover busily in a sort of glorified barbecue pit in the middle of the slab. But an air dome is not the sort of thing that the kids, or a distracted Pumpkin-eater could run in and out of when the fit took them-believe me, fighting your way out of an air dome can be worse than trying to get out of a collapsed rain-soaked tent if you make the wrong first move. This suspicion is inarticulately shared by the untold thousands of Americans who have already shed the deadweight of domestic architecture and live in mobile homes which, though they may never actually be moved, still deliver rather better performance as shelter than do ground-anchored structures costing at least three times as much and weighing ten times more.
The car, in short, is already doing quite a lot of the standard-of-living package’s job – the smoochy couple dancing to the music of the radio in their parked convertible have created a ballroom in the wilderness (dance floor by courtesy of the Highway Dept., of course) and all this is paradisal till it starts to rain. Even then, you’re not licked – it takes very little boosting, and the dome itself, folded into a parachute pack, might be part of the package. From within your thirty-foot hemisphere of warm dry Lebensraum you couldhave spectacular ringside views of the wind felling trees, snow swirling through the glade, the forest fire coming over the hill, or Constance Chatterley running swiftly to you know who through the downpour. Most pioneer air-conditioning men seem to have been nose-obsessed in this way; best friends could just about force themselves to tell America of her national B.O. – then, compulsive salesmen to a man, promptly prescribed their own patent improved panacea for ventilating the hell out of her. Somewhere among these clustering concepts – cleanli-ness, the lightweight shell, the mechanical services, the informality and indifference to monumental architectural values, the passion for the outdoors – there always seemed to me to lurk some elusive master concept that would never quite come into focus.
Please verify you are a human
Nor do you have to manhandle it-it could ride on a cushion of air (its own air-conditioning output, for instance) like a hovercraft or domestic vacuum cleaner. It is not the same thing as a uniform environment, it is simply an environment suited to what you are going to do next, and whether you build a stone monument, move away from the fire or turn on the air conditioning, it the same basic human gesture you are making. The second reason is that the mechanical invasion is a fact, and architects-especially American architects - sense that it is a cultural threat to their position in the world. American architects are certainly right to feel this, because their professional speciality, the art of creating monumental spaces, has never been securely established on this continent. It remains a transplant from an older culture and architects in America are constantly harking back to that culture. The second reason is that the mechanical invasion is a fact, and architects – especially American architects – sense that it is a cultural threat to their position in the world.
Imperatively, he concludes that the American architect needs to shift to a transportable standard kind of living package that would offer the homeowners complete freedom.Through his criticism, the author challenges the American architects to drop down their cultural ideals and principles, such as form follows function that entirely focuses on monumental spaces. Instead, he challenges the neoclassical designers to start incorporating mechanical invasion where the outside environment would influence their design. For example, he stresses the need for letting the wind, sunlight, and geographical location of the natural resources determine the architectural space. Aside from using more of mechanical services, the structures should rely mostly on natural environmental lighting and breeze to regulate heat and cold. The basic proposition is simply that the power-membrane should blow down a curtain of warmed/cooled/conditioned air around the perimeter of the windward side of the un-house, and leave the surrounding weather to waft it through the living space, whose relation ship in plan to the membrane above need not be a one-to-one relationship. The membrane would probably have to go beyond the limits of the floor slab, anyhow, in order to prevent rain blow-in, though the air-curtain will be active on precisely the side on which the rain is blowing and, being conditioned, will tend to mop up the moisture it falls.
Share this document
Indeed, Reyner had an ability to understand both the social and political involvement of visual arts in architecture and somehow his writing style had a way to be anything but cynical and descriptive. To the man who has everything else, a standard-of-living package such as this could offer the ultimate goody - the power to impose his will on any environment to which the package could be delivered; to enjoy the spatial freedom of the nomadic campfire without the smell, smoke, ashes and mess; and the luxuries of appliance-land without those encumbrances of a permanent dwelling. Only, the monument is such a ponderous solution that it astounds me that Americans are still prepared to employ it, except out of some profound sense of insecurity, a persistent inability to rid themselves of those habits of mind they left Europe to escape.
Grass-roots architects of the plains like Bruce Goff and Herb Greene have produced houses whose supposed monumental form is clearly of little consequence to the functional business of living in and around them. Likewise, Banham made an enormous influence on most of the current architects to incorporate a new innovative perspective on technological innovations when creating a project. Reyner’s ideas regarding the housing architecture in North America led to the notion of accepting and understating the environmental aspects in building the potential homes for inhabitants.
Technically, of course, it would be just about possible to make the power membrane literally float, hovercraft style. Anyone who has had to stand in the ground-effect of a helicopter will know that this solution has little to recommend it apart from the instant disposal of waste paper. But if the power-membrane could be carried on a column or two, here and there, or even on a brick-built bathroom unit, then we are almost in sight of what might be technically possible before the Great Society is much older. Right from the start, from the Franklin stove and the kerosene lamp, the American interior has had to be better serviced if it was to support a civilized culture, and this is one of the reasons that the U.S. has been the forcing ground of mechanical services in buildings – so if services are to be felt anywhere as a threat to architecture, it should be in America. Further he reckoned that the proper use of relevant technological modification would make the houses habitable and defined “home” as the integration of complex relationships between architecture and technological habits.
If someone could devise a package that would effec-tively disconnect the mobile home from the dangling wires of the town electricity supply, the bottled gas containers insecurely perched on a packing case, and the semi-unspeak-able sanitary arrangements that stem from not being connected to the main sewer – then we should really see some changes. Avis might still become the first in U-Tility, even if they have to go on being a trying second in car hire. As much as he sees the application of environmental machinery as a solutionto the future of American architects, the author considers the extreme dependence of mechanical services as a big mistake.Unlike the 1960s designers like Louis Sullivan and Frank Lloyd, who would borrow so much of the European ideals of architecture, he considers the present ones to be shifting towards the American extremist cultures. As a result, he states that modern design has centrally concentrated on the architectural form or material quality at the expense of balancing between structure and geographically environmental factors. Hence, he considers a better house that incorporates less use of mechanical systems, but more of integration with the environmental factors.
The nearest thing, in a significantly negative way, is Le Corbusier’s pour Ledoux, c’était facile – pas de tubes, which seems to be gaining proverbial-type currency as theexpression of profound nostalgia for the golden age before piping set in. Despite his subjective views, Reyner Banham is definitely one of the crucial architectural writers and critics. His criticism technique may seemed harsh and direct, however he was certain in his ideas and wasn’t afraid to experiment with technological innovations, professional practices, and the necessity for energy conservation of daily use and maintenance.
Moreover, the article demonstrates a comparison between an American and European architecture, by showing the negligence of American architects to efficiently optimise the provided environmental resources. For instance, the author has directly made a statement that “… Americans do not monumentalise or make architecture”, which is misleading the readers to assume that the American architects are incompetent to perform in accordance with the standards. Banham stated that American houses are created as a very preserved vacuum that concealed and perpetuated the constant technological maintenance without making any room for environment. “The two ideas behind this are to give everyone a standard of living package containing all the necessities of modern life and to do away with all the permanent structures of building, and men would not be constrained by past settlements. In A Home is Not a House, Banham attacks the North-American houses, built without a proper protection from cold and warm weather, based upo a widespread use of heating pumps, a general waste of energy and the production of an “environmental machinery”. The goal of present trends in domestic mechanization appears to be ever-more-flimsy structure that is made habitable by ever-more-massive machinery, and the Power-membrane house then pushes this idea to its logical/illogical conclusion - the open plan to end open plans, a walless, garden house sheltering under the spreading arms of the ultimate appliance.
No comments:
Post a Comment